刘雪雁, 李鹏春, 周蒂, LUJiemin, 陈广浩. 南海北部珠江口盆地惠州21-1油田CO2-EOR与碳封存潜力快速评价[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(3): 56-65. DOI: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.03009
    引用本文: 刘雪雁, 李鹏春, 周蒂, LUJiemin, 陈广浩. 南海北部珠江口盆地惠州21-1油田CO2-EOR与碳封存潜力快速评价[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(3): 56-65. DOI: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.03009
    Liu Xueyan, Li Pengchun, zhou Di, LU Jiemin, Chen Guanghao. QUICK ASSESSMENT OF CO2-EOR AND CO2 SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN HUIZHOU21-1 OILFIELD, PEARL RIVER MOUTH BASIN,[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(3): 56-65. DOI: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.03009
    Citation: Liu Xueyan, Li Pengchun, zhou Di, LU Jiemin, Chen Guanghao. QUICK ASSESSMENT OF CO2-EOR AND CO2 SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN HUIZHOU21-1 OILFIELD, PEARL RIVER MOUTH BASIN,[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(3): 56-65. DOI: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.03009

    南海北部珠江口盆地惠州21-1油田CO2-EOR与碳封存潜力快速评价

    QUICK ASSESSMENT OF CO2-EOR AND CO2 SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN HUIZHOU21-1 OILFIELD, PEARL RIVER MOUTH BASIN,

    • 摘要: 广东省是二氧化碳(CO2)排放大省,CO2大型排源集中于南海北部沿岸,与珠江口盆地大型油气田构造形成良好源汇匹配关系,因此, 珠江口盆地油气田的CO2驱提高采收率(EOR)和碳封存潜力与适宜性对于广东省低碳发展具有重要意义。采用UT快速评价模型,对珠江口盆地惠州21-1油田的主要油层开展了油层级别的CO2-EOR和碳封存潜力初步评价,结果表明:①惠州21-1油田的6个主要油层中,M10与L60两个层具有最高的采收率(51%),其次为L40Up层(40%),这3个层的突破时间(tD0)也较短,驱油条件优于其他层。各层CO2封存量(SCO2)约0.8PV (PV为孔隙体积),差别不大。结合油藏地质条件综合分析认为,M10层的CO2-EOR和碳封存潜力将是各层中最高的。②参数敏感性分析表明,注入开始时含油饱和度(Soi)和注入压力(Pinj)对采收率影响较大,变化幅度可达45%;tD0SCO2受(Pinj)影响较大,且SCO2对于压力条件比tD0敏感;最小混相压力(PMM)对评价结果的影响呈非线性。因此,当油田SoiPMM已确定时,要取得较好的采收率和SCO2封存效果,则主要通过适当提高注入压力来实现。

       

      Abstract: Guangdong Province is one of the biggest CO2 emitters in China. Large CO2 emission sites are mainly distributed along the coast, close to the potential offshore geologic storage sites in the Pearl River Mouth Basin (PRMB). Therefore, it is important for low-carbon economic development in Guangdong Province to assess the potential and feasibility of offshore CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) and carbon storage. Using a quickly screening model for CO2 flooding and storage, the potential of CO2-EOR and storage in Huizhou (HZ) 21-1 oilfield are assessed in this study. The aim is to quickly evaluate CO2-EOR and CO2 storage candidates in 6 oil reservoirs of the HZ21-1 oilfield. The quick-look assessments indicate that: (1) M10, L60 and L40Up would be the more promising reservoirs with higher dimensionless recovery factor (51%, 51% and 40% respectively) and shorter breakthrough time than others such as L50, L30 and L40Low; All of these six reservoirs would approximately store 0.8PV (Pore Volume) of CO2; Comprehensively considering the Original Oil In Place (OOIP) and reservoir properties of those more promising reservoirs, M10 would be the most suitable site for CO2-EOR and CO2storage; (2) In sensitivity analysis, all factors except minimum miscible pressure would have an linear impact on reservoir behavior, and initial oil saturation at the beginning of CO2 injection and injection pressure would significantly affect oil recovery, while CO2 injection pressure would affect breakthrough time and potential on dimensionless CO2 storage. CO2 storage capacity is more sensitive than breakthrough time regarding injection pressure. Hence in general, while initial oil saturation and minimum miscible pressure are constant, higher CO2injection pressure may increase EOR and carbon storage efficiency.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回